Showing posts with label constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constitution. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

This nation belongs to more than just those who believe in a God, right? I may be an Atheist, but I AM thankful for this nation I am a part of.

Claims from Ridiculous Christians

Joseph Farah

Have you ever come across a magazine called the Whistleblower? If you have not I encourage you to go and pick one up, take a peek inside, and read some of the craziest bullshit some Christians spew as truth. Absolute ridiculousness is what it is.

In the May 2011 issue of Whistleblower, Volume 20, No. 5, Joseph Farah writes an absurd article in a letter from the publisher on pages 3 and 4. I would like to comment on that particular article here. Yes, I know it is a fairly old article but I would still like to comment on it. I had actually never even heard of this magazine until I was at a friends home and she showed me a couple of articles from a different issue. I was intrigued and requested to borrow a few copies. I took the magazines home and began to go through them, coming across this piece fairly early on.

What I will do here is type the comment made by Farah, and then make a comment of my own in response. I will type his comments word for word just in case you were wondering. 

1. "Some people call me a radical." -Joseph Farah- May 2011 Whistleblower

     No. Radicals favor drastic political, social and economic reforms...something you clearly do not favor. You do not wish for gays to have the right to marry and you have problems with the idea of Pro-Choice (since it is otra de la ley of Him Who you worship) along with all sorts of other issues that you plant, grow, and harvest from your little field of religious-political fanaticism. Reforms should be good things. You wish to deny people basic rights and just in case you did not know, that would definitely NOT qualify as drastic reform. It might qualify as drastic set-back. 

     You have this air of wishing to revert to the 'old'. The 'old', some of it, is still very good. What you do not seem to understand is there are elements of the old that are not so good. Perhaps for the time in which it was birthed much of the old was good, but you also seem to forget that even those who created the old recognized that not all of it was good and great. It was all new, remember? Experimental. The Founding Fathers knew they wouldn't get it all right and even suspected they would get some of it wrong.


2. "As I've said many times, "conservatism" cannot save America. It's too far gone from what it was intended to be to save it through holding on to what we have left. And that, by definition, it what "conservatism" is all about."

     No. Your assessment of America being in a state of poor health is inaccurate. Yes, we DO have money problems and a deficit ten times the size of Texas. But, this is not what you are referring to, is it? Neither are you referring to pointless wars, the great need for good and affordable healthcare, bickering in Congress, helping communities to recover more quickly from natural disasters such as Katrina and Sandy, or dealing with the issues eating away at social security, are you?

     What you are referring to is essentially a religious issue for you, isn't it? For some twisted reason you think the issues that this nation in particular experiences are the direct result of people falling away from God and Jesus, right?


3. "If "conservatism" means cutting the budget but still overspending, borrowing from future generations and ignoring constitutional limits on the federal government's power, then I am not a conservative. Yet that is what many of the most prominent conservatives are doing in Washington right now."

     Oh, look! Here you try to make it look like it isn't a religious issue. This is a half-ass effort though, right? I mean, what is it that you say toward the very end of this article? Here is what you said:

     "If there is an opportunity for the bad guys to manipulate and exploit the crisis they have created, there is also an opportunity for lovers of liberty and lovers of God to do the same."

     See? You don't give a shit about the budget and the money and social security. What matters to you is WHO is qualified (according to your rules) to participate in various liberties and whether or not people who believe in God (presumably the same God you believe in) are the ones making the rules.

     Don't kid yourself into thinking that this country's problems have to do with people not wishing to follow your Invisible Pal. Yes, there are leaders in this country who abuse the system, abuse money, and abuse liberties...but this is NOT the case with all or even a majority of our leaders and has NOTHING to do with God. These problems are caused by people and not by some all-powerful divine being trying to teach the citizens of this nation any kind of lesson.


4. "George Washington was not a "conservative." Neither were the other founders of this once great country. They actually came up with something quite new in the history of the world- the idea of self governance. They did something unique in the history of the world. They not only threw off the yoke of foreign domination, but they invented a political system that took the shackles off the people and placed those shackles where they belong on central government."

     Sure, shackles were placed on our central government by the Founding Fathers. BUT, those shackles were intended for issues in regards to government function and legislation and NOT intended to shackle the government and prevent the government from changing things that somebody's God thinks are wrong...like same-sex marriage or removing religion from government (or keeping it out).

     Again, you are by no means a revolutionary or anything even remotely similar. What youARE is a pouting Christian, put-out by government shaking the tethers of religion. So, what you do is try to regain, or help to regain control by disguising your divine predilections as budget concerns, constitutional concerns (a HUGE lie), and concerns over abuses of personal liberties. Do these problems exist? Oh, yes...they do. But these issues are not your true focus, are they?


5. "Because we don't need to create something new. We only need to find our way to rediscovering what we had, something that was perverted over time and today is under full-scale assault."

     You need to be specific here, Farah. Rediscover what we had? Which part do you want to rediscover? No marriage rights for gays and lesbians? No voting for women or blacks? Poll tax? Manifest Destiny and loads of dead and displaced Native Americans? God in schools? Guns for everyone? Prohibition? Segregation? 


6. "In this case, the revolutionaries are the ones running the show. They are the lawless ones. They are the ones who are perverting justice and morality and order. We are merely the resistance fighters."

     No. There are not revolutionaries running the show. Yes, there are some real mother fuckers in government who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground and who do abuse much. However, not every leader is like this no matter how much you want to over-exaggerate. Do we have some serious issues? YES. Name a country that does not...

     ...BUT, what makes America great has nothing to do with God and everything to do with our people and our desire to excel, to exceed expectations, to protect liberties for all, and to persist in a push to be fair. Sometimes we miss our mark...but goddamn if we don't keep getting right back up time and again. Even THAT takes a while at times, but THAT is who we are.

     Also, so long as you approach the issues within justice, morality, and order from ANY kind of religious angle it is you who is doing the perverting. Your idea of resistance fighting is nothing more than resistance to fairness and change.


7. "A friend of mine said it this way: "We're not in the middle of a revolution. We're fighting the American Devolution.""

     I think it is the devolution from the idea that America was founded by God, for God and for people who believe in God and worship God that bugs you and Christians like you the most. Not all Christians are like you...thank God.


8. "The very will of the American people is under attack in a thousand ways. It's under attack through the popular culture with its desensitizing images and messages. It's under attack from the establishment press, whose members think they are so much wiser than the simple rubes who work hard, provide for their families and serve their country faithfully and heroically in times of national emergency. It's under attack from high priests in black robes who issue decrees that make a disgrace of the concept of the rule of law and mock the will of the people. It's under attack from elitists who run major foundations. It's under attack from globalists who seek to destroy America's national sovereignty. And it's under attack from a central government that has broken the shackles deliberately placed on it just over 200 years ago by our Constitution. The onslaught is coming fast and furious from these enemies of liberty."

     You make it sound like the American people are stupid. What is wrong with you? Do you really think our citizens are desensitized to the things in this world that are right? Do you only watch and think about and read about the bad things that happen in this nation? There ARE good things, you know. Just because people play GTA, watch risque movies, go to church less or not at all and listen to Lady Gaga that does not mean that they don't care about each other and don't love this country.

     Oh, and I hope your reference to people serving the country faithfully DOES NOT only apply to those who believe in God, right? You DO know that Atheists who love this country, and people of other faiths who love this country serve faithfully as well...right alongside their Christian brothers and sisters, right?


9. "They are attempting to overwhelm the will of the people and the rule of law by setting political and cultural bushfires from coast to coast. The process is in overdrive. They believe they have an opportunity to reach their goals for the conquest of the American spirit in the short term, and they don't want to miss this opportunity."

     Conquest of the American spirit? Conquest of the American spirit? We have made it through the Revolution, Civil War, sickness outbreaks, great natural disasters, world wars, conflicts, great political scandals, great tragedies in some of our individual communities, presidential assassinations, and FAR MORE. So, if you think the American spirit can be so quickly diminished, so obtusely swept aside with such great disdain...your faith is misleading you, and you sir, are fucked in the head.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

The United States: Founded on Faith, God, Christianity, and the Bible?

Popping the Long-Standing Bubble of Misunderstanding


     We will first start with a couple of videos that show a bit of what some people claim to be the truth in regards to the founding of the United States of America. Pay close attention to the presented statements and who supposedly made them. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and even Patrick Henry are a few of the fellows listed as having endorsed the idea that the USA was founded on Christianity.

     Pastor John Hagee renders a heart-felt rant that the USA was created by Christians for Christians. That's right, Hagee, you are all for limiting any religion so long as it isn't yours. Total turd.

     Oh, look what we have here. A cross between a Christian fundamentalist and Ike Eisenhower...with just a touch of General Patton. Stop eating the Twinkies, buddy.

     Now, dear friend, let us rebut the first three videos. Notice that the statements offered are statements made by the very same folks that some claim to have made assertions that this nation was founded on the Bible and Christianity.

     This country's Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were NOT founded on Christianity or the Bible or on or by Jesus. This guy addresses the issue here in a clear and concise manner. Very well done.

     Don't you just love it when people try to backtrack or reform the available information into something that better suits their needs? The Founding Fathers DID express great concern in relation to ethics and moral standing when contributing to the foundations of this country, yes. However, they did not view mixing religion and politics as a good idea on any level. And yes, Jefferson DID pen the 'Jeffersonian Bible' with the intent and purpose of removing the bullshit (like the virgin birth of Christ...which Jefferson thought absurdly ludicrous and useless) and leaving the information that provided something of relative value. I love it when Christians try to debunk valid, provable history.

     Here is a bit on the Jeffersonian Bible that some of the uber-religious, must-prove-America-was-founded-on-the-Bible folks of the nation should really watch.

     And here is another link for the viewing pleasure of those refusing to let go of the thought this nation was founded on the Bible and Christianity.

     Christians are loathe to ANY information that would result in any kind of loosening of their grip on the absurdly INCORRECT idea that this nation was founded on the Bible and Christianity. They simply cannot let this idea go, can they? Of course not. Doing so would be an admission if huge lies and purposeful misinterpretation of founding documents. So, what is done is careful formulation of MORE lies that are intended to validate the utter stupidity that the United States was founded as a Christian nation, by Christians, and for Christians.

     Our founding fathers knew better than to mix religion and politics.

     Politics requires reason, not religion. Once you mix religion and politics you fuck things up royally. That isn't to say that religious folk cannot think; many intelligent people are religious. The politics of any nation and the rules and laws and regulations of any nation should be founded upon reason and not under any circumstance founded on what some invisible guy in the sky or His employees say to do.

     Ask a person who believes that this nation was founded on Christianity WHEN the Pledge of Allegiance and the nations money added the phrase 'Under God' and you will find many of them truly think they were initially written with such. Nope. Didn't come about until the 1950s.



Saturday, May 4, 2013


Maintaining Our Country's Foundation


Now, we do have in our Bill of Rights the right to a trial. When I heard and even read articles that vehemently asserted that the accused man really does not even need to go on trial because of all the evidence against him (video, witnesses, etc.) and therefore he should be sentenced straight away, my stomach lurched with horror.

     Yes, what was done was terrible indeed. However, he still has to go to trial and be found guilty. I mean, and I hope I am saying this correctly, because the deed he is accused of is considered an act of terror against the US and the people of this nation does that mean he can be denied the right to trial? I am not saying that is what is happening. I just want to know if there is anything in our Constitution or Bill of Rights that states acts considered to be treason and a threat to national security automatically negate rights? I do not think so.

     Much of the conversation/articles that supported some type of revocation of the rights of this man carried an air of, "Well, he hates the US and its citizens and our government. Considering such, why should the rights afforded by the Bill of Rights of this nation that he hates so much extend to him?"

     Then there was the issue of the man not being properly read his Miranda Rights. Why in the world did they allow him to continue? Was it because they were afraid he would not say anything at all if they did? Wouldn't that be his right to remain silent? Was an attorney present for the man, and if so why didn't the attorney stop the man and insist Miranda Rights be read? Shocking to me also was an article in which  Representative Peter King, R-NY, is noted as saying he "totally disagreed" with the decision of the magistrate to read the accused his rights at a hearing.

     By asking these questions I absolutely do not intend any disrespect for the victims and their families or Boston. I love this country and our citizens, yes. Granted I say this without being a victim and without having any of my family and friends fall victim, but if people allow their anger and hatred for this man and his violent cause to create some kind of validation for breaching rights that are at the very core of this nation's foundation, well, if that happens a very dark, very ugly precedent may be set.

     Our justice system may not be perfect in application, but one of the reasons we have the laws and Constitution and Bill of Rights of this country is to strive for fairness and equality in the eyes of the law. There is, I think, an implied understanding and assertion by the drafters of our founding documents that what makes a nation strong, THIS nation strong, persevering, and lasting is a persistence to be just, and that the drive for justness/justice does not include the allowance of strong emotions of revenge/vengeance to dictate where and when and why rights may or may not be extended to the accused. 

     I understand the fear and the anger, the resentment and the sheer loathing for the accused. Like many people of this nation I still vividly recall 9/11 and the fear, sorrow, hurt, and even rage that I felt. But the last thing people of this nation should do is establish any kind of habit, political or otherwise, that undermines the purpose of our foundation and what sets this nation apart as an example for the rest.

     It is important that Americans remember the manner of approach taken in the prosecution of some of the Nazi leaders for war crimes at the trials at Nuremberg. Many government leaders including Winston Churchill, Joseph Stalin, and to a lesser degree FDR at first supported summary executions.

     However, while the world waded through the aftermath of WWII, trying to comprehend the scope of the inhumane, atrocious, and evil actions that brought about the deaths of tens of millions of people, US Secretary of War, Henry Stimson argued for the war trials to be commenced with the basic rights of due process as so noted in the US Bill of Rights.

     Stimson argued that such an approach would help to uphold the "democratic notion of justice" and that the purpose of the trial was for "prevention and not for vengeance." Because of this approach the Nuremberg Trials will be remembered in part for being consistent with due process.

     It would serve this nation and it's leaders and it's people well to remember and consider this.

Sunday, April 21, 2013

This post consists of my Twitter discussion of the most recent violent act against the American People: Bombing in Boston

Being as though I am not exactly computer savvy, I could not figure out how to re-arrange the tweets from first tweet to the last tweet, so everything goes from last to first. 

To read these in the proper order please start at the very end of this post.



  1. We have made it through a lot, showing the world our depth of perseverance and determination to do what is right. We shouldn't stop now.
  2. ...censorship, segregation, Cuban Missile Crisis...seriously, the list goes on and on and on and is testament to our strength as a nation.
  3. ...the Red Scare, polio, massive poverty brought on by the Great Depression, the Civil Rights Movement, questionable election results...
  4. ...attacks on our governmental leaders, scandal, abolition of slavery, Reconstruction, WWI, WWII, Cold War, women's rights, voting rights...
  5. We've through some serious shit as a people. American Revolution, American Civil War, expansion, Manifest Destiny and Native mistreatment...
  6. Our persistent wisdom as a nation, a people, sustains us and is what has always shone through once the dust has settled.
  7. We are better than that, and that particular character trait is part of why so many countries, free and enslaved alike, look up to us.
  8. We've not come this far as a strong nation, a strong people, just to recklessly cast aside the very ideals of fairness we fought so hard for
  9. We cannot allow our govt or people to even remotely begin to behave like those the world found guilty at Nuremberg.
  10. ...those who continued firing until the trenches were full.
  11. ...so that our firm foundation and strong character remains in tact lest we become like those who continued firing on those they hated...
  12. ...we are supposed to be able to look past our fear, anger, and desire for revenge so that we may think more clearly and react properly...
  13. ...but Americans really need to realize and remember why and what makes this nation so great...
  14. ...it was very easy and probably a natural reaction to want revenge and make somebody pay...
  15. We stood in front of our televisions that morning, hands over our mouths to try to stifle the screams of horror escaping as we watched...
  16. There's images from 9/11 I have never been able to get out of my mind. Pictures and footage of people jumping to their deaths, my God...
  17. This crime against the city of Boston and its people, MY fellow Americans and YOUR fellow Americans makes me so angry. I think back to 9/11
  18. It is difficult and may at times seem impossible to allow those accused of crimes against humanity and civilized society any rights.
  19. Two things in response to that: 1) The govt is not being just. 2) Tricking people into approving impingement of rights is not consent.
  20. "...deriving their JUST powers from the consent of the governed."
  21. Remember the part of the Declaration of Independence that says, "...That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men...
  22. ...and with each pass the answer that no or very little rights should be given picks up supporters.
  23. What kind of rights should the Boston bombing suspect have? This simple, yet frightening question is continuing to make the rounds...
  24. If you doubt this take a look at the history of man in its entirety.
  25. Surrendering freedom and liberty is not conducive to the continuation of American Culture and way of life.
  26. Attempting to fortify by retracting from the foundation makes about as much sense as putting the moat INSIDE the castle instead of OUTSIDE
  27. It is the same application in structures of thinking and politics and social interaction. Poor foundation is an assurance of failure.
  28. You do not have to be an engineer or carpenter or in construction to know that any structure without a proper foundation WILL NOT STAND...
  29. ...freedoms of binding factors in the foundations of this country. Last time I checked, structure will not stand without a proper foundation
  30. Do I love the United States of America? You bet I do. That is why I am so concerned as I watch political thugs and bullies hurt freedoms...
  31. So long as it was only happening to someone else, especially someone they did not like, they were just fine with debauchery in policy.
  32. People knew. They did not want to admit such because their lives went along as usual and their lives were not affected enough to complain.
  33. Some people later said they could never have known that such actions and policies could have ended in such world wide calamity. Such a lie.
  34. ...then their money was taken, their homes taken, their businesses and places of worship smashed and burned to the ground...so horrible.
  35. Little by little the lives of the Jews were taken away. They needed papers. Then they could only own so much. Then they could not travel...
  36. Hitler started doing the same goddamn thing, little by little, before he made his move and plunged humanity into one of the darkest pits...
  37. Will the rights of Muslims in this country end up being cut at the hocks in the name of preserving liberty and the American People?
  38. Will our govt end up keeping certain people or groups out of politics, the press, entertainment industry, transportation, and authority?
  39. Will our govt end up limiting what certain immigrants or participants of various faiths can and cannot do in the name of national security?
  40. The govt is furiously trying to lead the thoughts of as many people as possible down a chute that leads to one place, one end only: disaster
  41. Is the govt going to go after CRIMINALS or make people fearful of all those who think, feel, believe, worship, and love differently?
  42. Shall we start taking the freedoms of those we dislike? Shall we label them and mark them so we know automatically who they are?
  43. What will happen if we do not learn from history, recent history at that?
  44. ...a noose that gradually chokes the liberty that is the life-blood, or should be the life-blood, of any country and people.
  45. ...it is for the protection of the people. But it had nothing to do with protection of people and everything to do with tightening a noose,
  46. "But it is for our protection!" people will say. Really? The Nazis said the same damn thing when they started weaseling govt powers...
  47. Shall we all start carrying a satchel of papers that prove who we are, when we are, and why we are as we travel about our own country?
  48. We used to be able to go from San Diego to Tijuana, back and forth with no problem and no passport. It is not that way anymore. What's next?
  49. All of the changes and attempted changes in legislation do more to impede the movements of law abiding citizens, not criminals.
  50. The real immigration issue the govt is focusing on has to do with the control of the people INSIDE the country, not those OUTSIDE country.
  51. ...Do you think they will do any better with other individuals in various other pockets of immigration? No.
  52. Then there are talks about getting tough on immigration reform. There's a scary thought. Govt has been terrible to migrant farm workers...
  53. And you will have a lot of people thinking this is okay because the govt is just trying to protect us. Crap. All crap.
  54. The govt will try to push for more leeway in digging into the private lives of citizens and non-citizens alike...in the name of security.
  55. So, now there are discussions that the govt dropped the ball on the background investigations of the bombing suspects. Know what that means?
  56. The govt really needs to stop adding anything else to the fairy tale they have already spun regarding this entire situation...
  57. What should the govt do? Say, why don't we damage his throat so he cannot talk. We'll still sedate him for now till we know what he will do.
  58. I am surprised this suspect was (at least so far) allowed to live. But, since he IS still alive they certainly don't want him talking.
  59. Now the bombing suspect is "under sedation" and the govt does not know if he will ever be able to talk. What a load of shit.
  60. ...forget playing the verbal recording with computerized model. Show me the actual recording of the heat signature moving around.
  61. The computerized model of the supposed movement included the voice recording of the air crew warning the ground crew of the movements...
  62. The news reports said the heat signature device caught the movements of the suspect. Where is the video showing the suspect moving around?
  63. When they first ran the actual footage that was taken by the heat signature it appears from shadow that the guy was laying down on his side.
  64. Also, what happened to the actual heat signature video recording of the guy in the boat? I don't mean the animated/computerized crap either
  65. Also, is there footage of the gun battle where the one suspect was found hiding in a boat? The one clip I could find shows only police fire
  66. Of course, depending on which news network you watch the term explosive might not be used.
  67. ...I wonder if there is any footage of the chase of the suspects where they were reportedly throwing explosives out the window?
  68. There is footage, albeit limited, that show the "fierce gun battle" where one of the suspects was "found" hiding in a boat. I wonder...
  69. All of the reports and footage and news conferences and pictures and everything in between is intended to be legitimizing govt claims...
  70. ...special search helicopters zip back and forth overhead as an 'amazing' heat-signature photo is taken from above, civilians are there too
  71. ...and it is all on film. Imagine that. Cars with flashing lights importantly zoom hither and thither, a ferocious gun battle rages...
  72. Police, FBI, and a b-zillion others with matching uniforms and shiny badges pounce on the suspects like a cat cornering a rat...
  73. It makes for interesting propaganda to watch some of the footage of the 'bomb suspects' being captured, right?
  74. There is no celebration in death and that goes for either side in any conflict of every type.
  75. Oh Jesus. Geraldo Rivera is such an ass. He just said something along the lines of celebrating hunting down and killing terrorists. Moron.
  76. ...but that does not mean as a govt, as a people, and as a nation we should forsake what we fought so hard for, what our foundation is.
  77. I absolutely agree terrorist actions are not fair. Political dispute is NEVER fair, especially when the disagreeing parties start killing...
  78. ...we do not treat them differently. We treat them fairly; remember, this is part of what justice is in this country: fairness, equality
  79. Even if the actor of a terrorist deed is not a citizen of this country he/they still have rights. We DO NOT treat them differently...
  80. Refusing an individual their full rights as so afforded by the Constitution, even if it is a terrorist douche bag, is wrong and unacceptable
  81. This type of thinking is the complete antithesis of what this country was founded on. The Founding Fathers must be turning in their graves.
  82. It sets the horribly constructed stage for thinking perceived crime against the American people is a complete defense for denying rights.
  83. That idea sets the stage for people to start thinking it is okay to deny rights because of the bad things people do, and for justice.
  84. THAT is serious bull**** considering that to do such a thing as fail to read someone their rights, yet still charge them is unconstitutional
  85. She said something along the lines of, "It probably isn't necessary. I mean, we have the witnesses, the pictures, the camera videos..."
  86. The Fox News reporter just said something seriously frightening: an exception for Miranda Rights should be issued in this case...WTF!!!
  87. I DO, however, truly think that the compassion and kindness and support for the people of Boston by their fellow Americans IS genuine...
  88. It is like a low-budget, B-Rated flick with bad acting and an even worse script.
  89. ...the hallowed, holy ground of the Boston Marathon...justice has prevailed for the victims and for all Americans...
  90. Watch the Fox News reports; you just cannot miss the deluge of cheesy, over-the-top rhetoric: the cowards who committed this heinous deed...
  91. ...but what The People really need to be protected from is a govt that is no longer of The People, by The People, and for The People.
  92. Oh look what we found! See, govt was right yet again and acted heroically and protectively in its duty to protect The People...
  93. Evidence on computers, cell phones, individual witnesses, stories of direct links to extremist groups and behavior, the list goes on and on.
  94. But the govt is offering way too much info, so much so that the reports are beginning to sound unrealistic and hokey.
  95. But the govt is 'revealing' way too much, so much so that the reports are beginning to sound unrealistic and hokey.
  96. Now the govt suddenly has all this proof against the men accused? Maybe if the govt only offered a few things here and there as proof.
  97. People then become so grateful for govt saving the day that they don't mind that a few rights are trampled upon along the way.
  98. The result? The govt swoops in and miraculously dishes out a heaping helping of justice and bravado and patriotism.
  99. Keep people in that straight jacket of fear. Keep people in a state of mind that reeks with terror and makes people beg for govt help.
  100. Al-Qaeda, Muslim, extremist, terrorist, plot, plan, attack, murder and more pepper reports in every facet of the media.
  101. News reports continue to make copious use of phrases and catch words that will keep people on the edge of their seats, fearful and worried.
  102. Frankly, the news reports are getting stranger and stranger. The so-called evidence the govt is offering is overkill and it is obvious.
  103. Government would have everyone think that in order to ensure the safety of The People from the criminal minority rights must be malleable.
  104. Public majority follows the law. Criminal minority does not. Punishment of the many does not translate to punishment of the few.
  105. People who intent to hurt, maim, or destroy others do not suddenly find their hands tied behind their backs by changing gun laws.
  106. The recent rash of heartbreaking killings could not have been avoided by by trimming gun possession rights, unfortunately.
  107. A criminal who wants a gun WILL get that gun no matter what. Abridging gun rights is about controlling people, not protecting them.
  108. I wish to keep my Right to Bear Arms in tact. Do I own a gun? Nope. But, my right to possess a gun should not be revoked due to criminals.
  109. Construct gun laws that hold the criminals responsible, especially for violent crimes committed with weapons.
  110. Pruning the Right to Bear Arms for all Americans in general will do NOTHING for the safety of anyone.
  111. I think it is highly likely.
  112. Will this govt-planned deed of debauchery be used to support or guide legislation that limits or severely stunt the Right to Bear Arms?
  113. It really makes you wonder what the govt is trying to pull out from its sleeve while everyone is watching what is being pulled from a hat.
  114. As for the young men who were pinned as being the responsible parties...what a load of plop. The govt is working overtime to seed fear.
  115. Whatever political purpose is behind the idiocy and cruelty of committing crimes against the people of Boston, I hope it is fully exposed.
  116. Generally speaking, conspiracy theories can be absurd. This time, no. I think the people of Boston are getting the governmental shaft.